Europe’s most Talked about Cities: Digital VisibilityING Media
Digital visibility is key for cities building a global brand.
ING’s new ranking identifies how Europe’s Top 40 cities feature on social media and online news. In a context of rapid change and constantly evolving networks, cities are consolidating their leading positions over entirely new, sometimes digital-only conversations, creating powerful new opportunities for place branding by linking digital visibility into a wider communication strategy.
Europe’s most talked about cites
Over 300 global city indices benchmark cities on almost every aspect of urban life. These rankings influence investment, where talent clusters and our travel choices. However, there is little comparative research into the impact digital messaging is having on cities as brands.
Responding to this, ING has reordered Europe’s Top 40 cities, based on global city indices, by their share of the online conversation and provided some analysis on which cities punch most above their weight and which show the most potential for increasing their digital profiles.
“Visibility matters to cities, influencing investment, where talent concentrates and whether we decide to visit or not. The challenge is to ensure the quality of conversations happening across all forms of media – including digital – helps each city to not just climb the rankings, but also activates its unique story.”
Managing Director, ING
ING’s Top 40 by online mentions
– London and Paris share almost a third of the online conversation for the Top 40 cities.
– While London leads both city and digital mention rankings, Paris is ahead on total social media mentions.
– More than half of Top 40 cities show a strong correlation between city rankings and online mentions.
– Berlin scores well for digital news coverage, however, comparatively fewer mentions on social media reduce its overall ranking. The same pattern exists for many Northern European cities.
– London, Paris, Moscow, and Istanbul lead for Instagram snaps, being captured roughly twice as many times as any other city.
– Cities featured from the UK (5); France (2) and Spain (2) are collectively responsible for over half of all mentions in the Top 40.
– Italy (1 city) generates slightly more traffic than Germany (4), highlighting the unequal distribution of mentions between not only cities, but also countries.
Category share for Top 5 cities overall
While the share of the conversations by category for the top five cities are substantially similar, London’s dominance as Europe’s financial centre is reflected in having higher shares in the business and talent categories. Madrid and Barcelona feature more strongly in technology.
Comparing visibility between city rankings and online mentions
Several European cities not featured in the Top 40 by global city indices rank highly for digital mentions. Porto and Liverpool, for example, have digital mentions similar to Amsterdam, while some cities in the UK, Germany, Italy and Poland produce online mentions comparable to Copenhagen and Oslo, potentially presenting an opportunity to challenge global city rankings.
ING’s investigation into Europe’s Most Talked About Cities covered 222 cities in 46 countries included in a diverse set of 23 publicly available global city rankings. This aggregated list of Top 40 cities appearing on city indices were then ranked by total 2018 digital mentions on Twitter, forums, blogs, news, Tumblr, Facebook and Instagram (partial data set). Spelling variants were included for English, Chinese (simplified), Spanish, Arabic, Portuguese, Japanese, Russian, German, French, Malaysian, Indonesian, and the city’s local language, representing over 90% of total online mentions. Mentions containing sport were limited. Category shares, generated from a set of keywords unique to each category, represent only English mentions.
Top 5 cities punching above their weight for digital mentions
These cities generate significantly more mentions on digital media relative to their positions on city indices, presenting an opportunity to climb the rankings by consistently improving the quality and impact of the conversations about them. Their category shares show significant variance highlighting areas these cities can potentially consolidate a lead in.
– None of the Top 5 cities perform strongly for more traditional news coverage, except Rome, but benefit from huge amounts of user-generated content. Rome is the top performer overall for forum mentions and does particularly well with blogs too (third), however, the percentage of conversations about Rome taking place in English are of the lowest for any city.
– Lyon’s online visibility ranking is 23 places higher than its city ranking. This is driven by conversations around technology. Rome scores the highest shares for culture and liveability.
– Cities with higher business category shares tend to have higher talent shares too, as with Geneva and Manchester. In Geneva, this conversation is concentrated on Twitter and online news.
– Edinburgh also outshines on Twitter, but has relatively lower news coverage. In contrast, Hamburg’s otherwise solid performance includes limited Twitter coverage, despite the city’s strong interest in talking about technology online.
Top 5 cities with the most digital profile potential
Global city rankings highlight these as the cities we should pay attention to, but this doesn’t necessarily translate to the digital world, where these cities attract fewer mentions than their peers. Therefore, these cities have the most potential to grow their digital profiles.
– Despite being ranked lower than Oslo, Copenhagen and Zurich by city rankings, Stockholm is generally talked about more on digital media.
– Warsaw shows a strong pairing of culture and liveability (like Rome) with the highest share for both category shares for this group of cities. Copenhagen has a similar profile.
– Zurich’s business focus is apparent with the highest shares for business and talent (like Brussels, Dublin and London). However, it also has of the lowest digital conversation shares for culture and liveability.