Skip to content

Audio Version

See more about

More info


Berg, E. et al. (1982) Det lilla kollektivhuset. En modell för praktisk tillämpning . Stockholm: T14, Byggforskningsrådet.
Caldenby, C. & Wallden, Å (1984) Kollektivhuset Stacken . Göteborg: Korpen.

Ceccarelli, P. (2012) Introduzione . In Gresleri, J. (2012). Cohousing. Esperienze internazionali di abitare condiviso . Busalla: Plug in.

Coste, C (ed.) (2002) Roland Barthes, Comment vivre ensemble. Cours et séminaires au Collège de France (1976-1977) . Paris: Seuil Imec.

Fromm, D. (1991) Collaborative communities: cohousing, central living and other new forms of housing with shared facilities . New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Fromm, D. (2012) Seeding Community: Collaborative Housing as a Strategy for Social and Neighbourhood Repair, Building Environment , 38, 3, 364-394.

Gresleri, J. (2012) Cohousing. Esperienze internazionali di abitare condiviso . Busalla: Plug in.

Gresleri, J (2017) Attorno al cohousing: l’abitare collaborativo , in Galdini R., Marata A. (a cura di), La Città Creativa , Roma: CNAPPC, p. 133-139.

Gresleri, J. (2018) Ceci n’est pas un «coho» , in PHOENIX. Il Padiglione de L’Esprit Nouveau tra ricostruzione e restauro , Bologna: Centro Stampa Regione Emilia Romagna p. 179-194.

Risselada, M. (2017) (ed.) The Space Between. Alison and Peter Smithson . Köln: Verlag der Buchhandlung Walter König.

ScottHanson, C. & ScottHanson, K. (2005) The CoHousing Handbook: Building a Place for Community . Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

Vattimo, G. (a cura di) (1976) Martin Heidegger. Saggi e discorsi . Milano: Mursia.

Zevi, B. (1979) Architettura in nuce . Firenze: Sansoni.

No More Cohousing, but Still Cohousing

For some time there has been a dizzying increase in publications about collaborative housing (specifically on cohousing), described and studied from the architectural perspective, but even more from the point of view of managerial and generative processes.

Through their own algorithms, academic social platforms offer new contributions almost daily from researchers engaged in the investigation of the development, constitution and management methods of these forms of collective housing. The role of stakeholders and users is analyzed, along with how the groups are defined and created, feasible financing solutions, etc. in a positivist perspective on an alleged, progressive, quantitative increase in creating what is considered the most attractive housing solution in recent times. In fact, cohousing is more and more often cited as the great innovation of the 21st century in the housing field, and it is intended as the possible socio-ecologically sustainable alternative with the potential to move financiers, administrations and residents’ interests.

The “co-generative housing” network within the city and its suburbs. A real connection of spaces-services-facilities.
Full content is available only for registered users. Please login or Register

urbanNext (June 2, 2023) No More Cohousing, but Still Cohousing. Retrieved from
No More Cohousing, but Still Cohousing.” urbanNext – June 2, 2023,
urbanNext March 17, 2020 No More Cohousing, but Still Cohousing., viewed June 2, 2023,<>
urbanNext – No More Cohousing, but Still Cohousing. [Internet]. [Accessed June 2, 2023]. Available from:
No More Cohousing, but Still Cohousing.” urbanNext – Accessed June 2, 2023.
No More Cohousing, but Still Cohousing.” urbanNext [Online]. Available: [Accessed: June 2, 2023]

urbanNext | expanding architecture to rethink cities and territories


Sign up to our newsletter

Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
High Density
Middle Density
Low Density
No Density







all formats